Revolutionary Business Management by Ricardo Semler

Semco’s huge growth spurt
Semco is a company made large by Ricardo Semler. Among the activities of the company are Industrial Machine Construction, Semco Ventures (High Tech and Internet Services) and SemcoHR (Human Resources). Annual sales rose by $ 4 million from Ricardo Semler in 1982 to $ 35 million in 1994, with n aannual growth that is always over 25 percent and sometimes even 40 percent. The company had 3,000 employees in 2003, compared with 90 in 1982 ‘…’ As of 2003, Semco had annual sales of $ 212 million. In 2010, the company had more than 5000 employees. ” In addition, during the Brazilian hyperinflation, Ricardo Semler also prevented Semco’s bankruptcy in 1990.

Continue reading “Revolutionary Business Management by Ricardo Semler”

The succes of Mondragon: Spain’s giant co-operative


In 1956 graduates of a local technical college founded Mondragon in the town of Mondragoe. The northern Spanish town now has become a corporation of 100 smaller cooperatives which operates in four areas: finance, industry, retail, and knowledge. In 2013, the corporation posted a total revenue of over €12 billion and about 74.000 employed, making it Spain’s fourth-largest industrial and tenth-largest financial group.

Continue reading “The succes of Mondragon: Spain’s giant co-operative”

Social capital problems between the poorest in Mexico

The Recepac network becomes Reocone
This blog is based on my graduation thesis that compares the Mexican Reocone ‘network’ (co-operative) with it predecessor Recepac. Until 1997 Recepac was a national network which included four states in Mexico. The Chiapanecan part of the network (Chiapas ia a Mexican state), with 14 member organisations (coffeeproducers, women- and religious organizations) against four organizations in all of the other states, chose to become independent. The main reason for that was that the Chiapanecan part of the network proved to be the only state with an important contribution in size and impact compared to the four organizations in the other states. All of the 14 organizations of Recepac remained in the later Chipanecan Reocone network, with no change in their main goal to fight their poverty by helping eachother.

Continue reading “Social capital problems between the poorest in Mexico”

Learning from co-operation: anti-poverty co-operatives in Holland

Peer’M: Social co-operatives Against Poverty.

On September 29th, the national manifestation ‘Peer’M! Out of poverty, on the road to social security! isorganized by the Platform Social Alliance; the Dutch national network of poverty alleviation. The affiliated social partnerships aim to: rise poverty above the poverty line. September 29th, a four-year review of basic initiatives and steps will be made by and about social co-operatives in the Netherlands. ‘The focus is on the new relationships between citizens and government in public tasks’. Twelve initiatives have already been described in detail on the website These are co-operatives of collaborative peer-to-peer experience experts who, each from their own expertise, try to get out of poverty through often completely new creative initiatives, thus creating life-security for themselves and others.

One of these the Free Exit initiative describes the core of a social co-operation: “We want to involve people in decision-making completely. We decide together about all things that involve a cooperative. We also have equal voting rights; there is no boss. We choose to be a co-operative because we really form it to the feeling of our being and how we-want-it-together. Especially that ‘together’ feeling is very important. ‘ The Durable Soesterkwartier association chooses a similar but other legal form: their second initiative they call ‘The Conscious Broke Residents Foundation’. The idea behind it is that there are no major financial contracts because it only gives a headache and determines the agenda.

Continue reading “Learning from co-operation: anti-poverty co-operatives in Holland”

Triggerpoints: 10 big catastrophic blunders of companies

Triggerpoints often lead to protest and uprisings. The next 10 disasters have caused a lot of critic, especially about the ethics of business. The scandals mentioned are so large that they led to a critical mass of protesting people: they got broad media attention and companies were put under pressure to undo or compensate their deficiencies.

1. Venom disaster Bhopal

The venom in Bhopal is known as one of the biggest industrial disaster ever. In Bhopal, India, in 1984, 40 tonnes of methyl isocyanate (MIC) were released from a Union Carbide pesticide factory. This event led to at least 50,000 victims with serious illnesses. In addition, the well-being of between 150,000 and possibly 600,000 was compromised, of which 6,000 later died as the consequence of the exposure. Thirty years after date (2014), malformed children are still born as a result of the disaster.

Continue reading “Triggerpoints: 10 big catastrophic blunders of companies”

Critical loneliness

Are you never lonely?
That’s hard to believe: many people are lonely and often do not dare to share that with their surroundings. There are the more obvious cases such as neglected children, widows or divorced people, those with mental disorders or those who are ignored by their physical ‘shortcomings’. Others are overworked or do not feel support from the people around them. And many of us are literally consumed by our crazy society in which you try to keep up with the Johnson’s. Make money, performance, status, school pressure etc., we all know it.

Continue reading “Critical loneliness”

Critical Mass in Networks Part I: Theory

Part I: GOAL

1.1 Vision: Critical Mass

‘Today’s organizational and societal challenges are too big to be addressed by heroic leaders alone. A more contemporary understanding of leadership as a shared process is needed. Collective leadership occurs when mobilized masses achieve exponential results through their connections. If leaders, organizations, partnerships, cross-sector alliances, NGOs, community-based organizations, and grassroots movements are going to leverage the potential they have for impact, then they must understand the power of informal networks.’ (Center for Creative Leadership, 2014).
Social organizations can reach a critical mass and grow into a powerful social movement. Critical mass is the explosive attraction of fans around an existing coalition of organizations. The associated openness and the large number of new participants can transform into an explosive movement that produces significant results. Picture 1 shows a power-law distribution, which is especially triggered in social systems where many people express their dissatisfaction about many causes (Shirky, C. 2003). Of course, success is no guarantee, without any form of leadership, chaos will arise with possible far-reaching disadvantages such as violence (what we see in many revolutions).
Pic 1: reaching critical mass (Theory of Disruptive Innovation, C. Christensen, 2006)

Continue reading “Critical Mass in Networks Part I: Theory”

Critical Mass in Networks: part II Practice

PART II: Network Management

• 2.1 Focus

– Vision:  Focus is made out of purposive and adaptive network movements towards an envisioned end state. Accordingly successful focus has two important properties: 1) goal directedness, and 2) adaptability (to remain directed to the goal).‘A network energized by a goal has a purpose that enables it to organize its members, facilitate meetings and pursue resources’ (Kilduff and Tsai, 2003). ‘On the question of goals, research shows the wisdom of maintaining a narrow focus, and a single goal. Organizations pursuing a single goal are far more successful than those pursuing many goals.’ (Dobson, C., 2001).

-Frame alignment: ‘Frame alignment describes what happens in small informal groups that promote social change. Movement supporters attempt to bring others around to a mobilizing frame by providing examples and rationales that legitimize the movement. If others buy the examples and rationale, they adjust their view of issues and events so they are aligned with the new mobilizing frame’ (Dobson, C., 2001).

Continue reading “Critical Mass in Networks: part II Practice”

Critical Mass in Networks: part III cases


Appendix I: The Occupy Wallstreet Case

Months before the Occupy movement began, the Spanish Movimiento 15-M (initiator), begun demonstrating on May 15th against the economic crises ;close to the local and regional elections of May 22th. They planned to hold events in many nations on October 15, 2011 (reaching in a world-wide critical mass).


July 13th – Adbusters makes the initial proposal for a peaceful demonstration to Occupy Wall Street (OWS).

August 2nd – ‘New Yorkers Against Budget Cuts’ chose August 2 to incorporate a ‘General Assembly’ with another group holding a strategy session for OWS. Afterwards, these two groups ‘gather[ed] into working groups to plan for the September 17 event’.

August 23th – The hacktivist group Anonymous encourages its’ followers to take part in the protest.

Continue reading “Critical Mass in Networks: part III cases”


Allee, V. (2008). Value Network Analysis and Value Conversion of Tangible and Intangible Assets. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9, 5-24.

Allison, J. (2010) Broken Hearts and New Creations, Continuum.

Borgatti, S. and Cross, R. (2003). A Relational View of Information Seeking and Learning in Social Networks. In: Management Science, 49, 4:432-445.

Burt, R. (2004). Structural Holes and Good Ideas. In: The American Journal of Sociology, 100, 2, 349-399.
Burt, R. (2005). Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital. Oxford University Press, New York.

Castells, M. (2012). Networks of Outrage and Hope. Social Movements in the Internet Age. ISBN-13: 978-0-7456-6284-8
Castells, M. (2001). The Power of Identity. ISBN 1-55786-873-5.

Center for Creative Leadership (2014). Networks: How Collective Leadership Really Works.

Chesbrough H. (2003). Open innovation; The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting.
Chesborough, H. (2006). Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, from Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge.

Christensen, C., Baumann, H., Ruggles, R., & Sadtler, T. (2006). Disruptive Innovation for Social Change. Harvard Business Review, 84(12): 94-101.

Cullen, K., Willburn, P. et al (2015) Center for Creative Leadership. Networks: How Collective Leadership Really Works (

Coleman, J. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. In: American Journal of Sociology, 94: 95-120.

Cross, R. (2002). Making invisible work visible: Using social network analysis to supportstrategic collabortion. In: Emerald Management Reviews, 44, 2.
Cross, R. (2012) Personal Network Analysis Workbook.

Devaney, J. and Heley. M. (2016).

Fractal Enlignment Blog (
Gladwell, M. (2001). The Tipping Point; how little things can make a big difference, Abacus.

Dobson, C. (2001, Social Movements: A Summary of What Works,

Fearon, J. 1998). Bargaining, Enforcement, and international cooperation. International Organization 52: 269-305.

Hargadon, A. (2002). Brokering knowledge: Linking learning and innovation. In: Research in Organizational Behavior, 24, 41-85.

Hinkel, J. (2008). Transdisciplinary Knowledge Integration Cases from Integrated Assessment and Vulnerability Assessment. Ph.D. thesis ISBN 978-90-8504-825-1, Wageningen.

Hoppe, B., Reinelt, C. (2010). The Leadership Quarterly 21, 600–619 In: Social Network Analysis and the Evaluation of Leadership Networks.

Kilduff and Tsai (2003). Social Network and Organizations. SAGE Publications, London.

Lissack, M. (2002). The Interaction of Complexity and Management. Praeger, ISBN-13: 978-1567204278

Narayanan, V.K. (2001). Managing Technology and Innovation for Competitive Advantage, Englewood-Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Longman, 2001.

Nicolau, N. and Birley, S. (2003). Social Networks in Organizational Emergence. Th University Spinout Phenomenon. In: Management Science, 49, 12, 1702-1725.

Metcalf, F. and Gallagher, B. (2001). What Would Buddha Do at Work? 101 Answers to Workplace Dilemmas. ISBN-13: 978-1569753002.

Müller-Prothmann, T. (2006): Leveraging Knowledge Communication for. Innovation. Framework, Methods and Applications of Social Network Analysis (dissertation)

Norberg-Hodge, H. (2016). (

Ostrom, E. (2011). 8 Principles for Managing a Commons.

Podolny, J. and Baron, N. 1996). Resources and Relationships: Social Networks and Mobility in the Workplace. In: American Sociological Review 62(5).

Robins, G. and Pattison, P. (2006). Multiple networks in organizations. Presented during the 12th Australian Mathematical Psychology Conference, Adelaide.

Rothwell, J. (2016). How to change the world. (

Ruhri, M. & Katzmair, A. (2007). Exploring Social Networks With Geographic Information Systems. Sunbelt Conference 2007 Corfu, Greece. FAS Research.

Rulke and Galaskiewicz, 2000). Distribution of Knowledge, group Network Structure, and Group Performance. In: Management Science, 46, 5, 612-625.

Page, S. (2009). The Great Courses: Understanding Complexity. (

Porta, D. , Diani M. (2006). Social Movements: an Introduction. ISBN-13: 978-1-4051-0282-7.

Shirky, C. (2003). Power Laws, Weblogs, and Inequality. On the “Networks,Economics, and Culture” mailing list:

Soh P. (2003) The role of Alliances in Information Acquisition and its Implications for New Products Performance, Journal of Business Venturing, 727-774.

TESA and GRIDtv (2014). Own The Change Building Economic Democracy One Worker Co-op at a Time.

Tracy, B., Thompson, M. (2010).Now, Build a Great Business!: 7 Ways to Maximize Your Profits in Any Market.

World Social Forum (2016).

Zhou, J., Shin, S., Brass, D. and Choi, J. (2009). Social Networks, Personal Values, and Creativity: Evidence for Curvilinear and Interaction Effects. In: Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 6, 1544–1552.

Aangeraden literatuur
Bacon, J. (2009). The Art of Community. Building the New Age of Particpation (

Cross, R., Borgatti, S. and Parker, A. (2002). Making Invisible Work Visible: Using Social Network Analysis to Support Strategic Collaboration, California Management Review, Vol. 44, 2.

Lank, E. (2008). Collaborative Advantage: How Organizations Win by Working Together.

Marwell, G., Oliver, P. and Prahl, R. (1988). Social Networks and Collective Action: A Theory of the Critical Mass. III. In: The American Journal of Sociology, 94, 3.

Prechter, R. (2002). The Wave Principle of Human Social Behavior and the New Science of Socionomics.

Ropp, C. (2012). A Simple Explanation of Absolutely Everything. ISBN: 978-1-300-46996-4.

The partnership scorecard. (

The TODO Group (2015). The Ultimate Community Code of Conduct. (